I attempted in Fusion Studio because it appeared there were some preference settings that might reduce render time, e.g. I'm not using Fusion Studio at all, Don - my results are from within Resolve Studio. Under 27 minutes is pretty good, I guess. So clearly a portion of the 37 minutes was due to H264 or the pipeline. I tried with with ProRes 422 LT on my M1 Max and got a render time of 26 minutes, 45 seconds. What is interesting in this case is that my computer is not even remotely busy in either case so it really must come down to a single threaded excution that is slowing everything down. When I get a chance, I'll try the same on the M1 Max. I tried this to DNxHR LB on my Windows rig and got a time of 1 hour 18 minutes (as compared to 1 hour and 41 minutes to H264). If you're uploading to YouTube or Vimeo Pro, note that they recompress everything uploaded, so there may be value in just uploading the highest-quality file you have (say, 422LT) and then let the service re-encode the video. This will reduce the amount of stress on the system having to render a Fusion composition and also doing H.264 compression at the same time. Once that's done, take that flattened file and then render that out as H.264 for whatever you're trying to do with it. Marc Wielage wrote:A suggestion and possible workaround: render it out to a simpler format like ProRes 422HQ (or 444 if you want). The difference between this and my previous test is probably that my original test was in an UHD timeline rather than 4K DCI. On my M1 Max it took just over 36.5 minutes. On my Windows rig this time it took 1 hour and 41 minutes to render. On the M1 Max I selected the option to render with hardware if available (wording to that effect). On my Window machine I selected NVIDIA for the encoder to get the fast encoding (I believe the time taken to render is almost exclusively due to Fusion and very little due to the H264 export). Once it was loaded, moved to the Deliver page and selected a QuickTime H264 export at the project resolution of 4K DCI, 24 fps Entered the Fusion page and from the File menu, selected Import > Fusion composition and pointed it to your comp fileĥ. Created a new timeline based on the Fusion comp in step 2Ĥ. Created new Fusion comp (5 minutes long)ģ. New Resolve project set to 4K DCI resolution, 24 fpsĢ. Having previously opened your comp in Fusion Studio I noticed that it was 7200 frames long (5 minutes at 24 fps)ġ. Just to confirm a couple of things I repeated this test starting from a fresh project. I think my next step is to install a fresh version of the operating system and then do a complete uninstall/reinstall of Davinci Resolve Studio and Resolve Studio. But I am a novice with Davinci Resolve and do not believe that I have changed the settings much. What I cannot explain is why my 16" M1 Max 32 core GPU with 64 GB RAM is 50% slower than your copy. But no where near as slow as I reported in my previous post. So rendering the composition in Fusion Studio is still slower than rendering in Davinci Resolve Studio. ![]() I also rendered the same composition (with the sRectangle/sGrid as a substitute for DVS grid node) using Fusion Studio as a 4K DCI, H.264 and. I rendering just the composition in Davinci Resolve Studio and it took 45 minutes-about 50% more time than on your machine. In any case, I have more information and an apple-to-apple comparison and now have the complete 3 table composition for Fusion Studio that I uploaded to this forum. It was for an entire 16 minute video in which that table composition was just a portion. The hour and 30 minutes was for more that just the Fusion composition that I uploaded to this website. I will need to repeat this test again with all three tables to see if I can get the same results. This was not what I suspected as from everything I read, Fusion Studio was faster. comp file that I imported into Davinci Resolve Studio Fusion.ĥ) Then I placed the 2 table composition on a new timeline and rendered.Ħ) I was shocked to find that Davinci Resolve Studio Fusion composition rendered in 2 minute 30 second. This took 10 minutes and 23 seconds.Ĥ) I then saved the this two table composition as a. But you need to combine sGrid with a shape (in my case I used sRectangle) to define the grid pattern.Ģ) Instead of doing all three tables in my composition I did two of them in Resolve Studio including the data in the grid.ģ) Rendered in Resolve Studio. So I had to learned how to use the shape tools. Davinci Resolve Studio Fusion or Fusion Studio.ġ) Resolve Studio does not have a Grid node. I did some testing today and I am starting to get a difference opinion in which is faster rendering.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |